I still think of it as “cheating”. When I use digital tools to alter something I have painted by hand. Maybe it is the stigma from the over and incorrect use of Photoshop in social media.
Most often, if I use Photoshop with my artwork, it is only to make the painting look online, the way it does in person. To alter colors that have scanned flat, or too saturated.
For this piece I used Photoshop as a save. I attempted to paint dark, stormy clouds. And failed. Big time failed. Haha. I let the paint dry, and tried to rework what I had done. But they just got worse. I tried several times. Finally, I rewet the sky, and washed off all the paint. Arches is great like that. You can scrub and start over.
I had used a cheap paint, and that is probably why the clouds did not work the way I thought they would. The darker color also left some blotchy, uneven stains. Just enough to make the sky look dirty. Can’t have that. Haha.
It took more time to fix the sky, than it had taken for me to ruin it. Digital isn’t always a quick fix. I played with adding puffy white clouds. Changed the blue. But nothing was working. So I used the clone stamp to “copy and paste” clean sky, to areas of dirty sky.
Using this technique is great, when you are trying to hide a speck of dirt that got on the scanner bed. But using it to fill the whole sky can be a challenge, when there is very little “clean” sky to copy. The texture from the paper ends up being repeated so often, that it creates a pixilated pattern. Not good. I only had two small areas of clean sky to work with.
You might not be able to see the pattern without zooming in. I only highlighted a few. But this should help to show what the problem is.
Next I had to copy and paste some more, to camouflage the pattern. And to be sure, I used the blur tool, to soften areas. To “mask” the pixel edges.
After all this work. A couple of hours at least. I realized, and laughed at myself, that it wasn’t really necessary. (And for such a small piece!) I always save my blog images for the web. Which means that it is a small file size, and much of the details are lost. It is a low resolution image. So if someone tries to steal my work, to reproduce it, all they will get is a blurry mess.
So when I read Hockney’s quote, I laughed. Lordy! Haha. I know he meant something else. But it fit my silly situation just as well.
I’ve been stunned watching Nicholas Wilton alter his students’ paintings to improve them with Photoshop. I suppose one day I will study it, when I get time… Ha ha! After all your woes you made a good painting here. There is always so much joy in your work. Sometimes I laugh out loud. This seems to happen more often with your cactus characters. The big one waving is my favourite so far.
Haha. 🙂 So glad you like it Sea. I’d love to learn Photoshop more, enough to do actual paintings with it. But there is sooo much to learn. And I think it is more fun painting with tools in hand. Thanks so much for your generous compliments. So fun to hear the cacti bring you JOY. 🙂 Have fun today! I love your self portrait series!
What a lot of work you go through to make something work – if it is that bad I just throw it out – lol. BTW if you never tell that you use photoshop no one would ever know.
True Val. Haha 🙂
I should have just started a new piece. But it was late, and I was tired. And I had no idea I would play with it that much in the program. Haha. 🙂 And still I ended up with a plain, boring sky. And a piece not worth remembering. Haha 🙂 Have fun today Val.
Sheila, very engaging backstory—thanks for taking the time to share.
Thanks for taking the time to read it Dotty. Haha 🙂